SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 520

S.B.SINHA, V.S.SIRPURKAR
Rajendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V.S. SIRPURKAR, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant herein as also the subsequent order dismissing the review petition are challenged in this appeal.

3. Appellant herein came to be appointed by Leva Education Union, Leva Boarding Zilla Peth, Jalgaon, hereinafter called the “Management” in Nandinibai Vamanrao Girls High School, Jalgaon w.e.f. 1.1.2001 vide letter dated 30.12.2000. The appellant belongs to the “Other Backward Class” (OBC) category. He was a science graduate and had worked as a clerk in a private bank. He applied to an advertisement issued by respondent no. 3 dated 23.12.2000 inviting applications for the post of Junior Clerk. Significantly, this post had become vacant since the earlier employee working on this post was promoted. That promotion was given due to the superannuation of a Chief Clerk. With the result, Shri S.S. Gangapurkar was promoted as a Chief Clerk and so also Shri V.B. Patil who was the junior most employee was promoted as a Junior Clerk w.e.f. 1.11.2000. It was, therefore, that the post had fallen vacant. It was thus a clear vacancy. The advertisement clarified that

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top