SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 719

S.B. SINHA & HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Chandrappa & Ors - PETITIONERS
Versus
State of Karnataka - RESPONDENT
Appeal (crl.) 609 of 2006
Decided on : 29/04/200

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 313 – Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 143, 147,148,302 and 324 read with 149 - Ancestral land - Possession of their respective shares - Demanding a share - Accused as well as assaulting with sickles and choppers - PW3 went to rescue of his brother but he too was assaulted and having sustained an injury he ran away towards village - PWs1 and 2 thereafter entered garden and saw that was lying grievously injured near Samadhi adjoining land - Accused and also abused and assaulted two women - PW4 who was attracted to place rushed in with some water which he attempted to put in mouth but he succumbed to his injuries at spot - PW3 was also taken hospital by PW11 whereas PWs.1,2 and 4 stood near dead body. It was also noticed that the accused while running away had left behind a sickle and a club near dead body - Held, Prosecution is not called upon to explain each and every injury on the person of an accused and in this view of matter the non- explanation of an insignificant injury on person of only one does not dislodge prosecution story - It has also been contended that no case under section 302 of Indian Penal Code had been made out and if at all accused were liable to be convicted under section 304 Part-II of Indian Penal Code - Court find no merit in this plea - It is clear from record that accused had come to place of incident fully armed with object to sort things out with deceased as he was creating problems for them and their father over land in question and to remove him from scene once and for all - Furthermore in light of serious injuries caused to deceased and to PW3 matter does not fall within ambit - Appeal Dismissed.

JUDGMENT:

HARJIT SINGH BEDI,J.

1. The facts leading to the filing of this appeal by way of

special leave are as under:

2. PW-1 Bhagyavathi, wife of Thimmappa deceased of village Arebilachi, is the complainant in the case. Thimmappa was the son of Navilapa. Navilapa had, in addition, five other sons Devendrappa, Manjappa, Chandrappa, Nagarajappa and Gadigeshappa and two daughters including Ratnamma PW-2. Navilapa had about 12 acres of ancestral land and he had divided the said land equally between himself and his sons and all were in possession of their respective shares thereafter. Thimmappa, Devendrappa and Manjappa were residing separately whereas the other two, Chandrappa and Gadigeshappa, were residing in their old family home whereas Nagarajappa was residing with his father Navilapa and his sister Ratnamma. Thimmappa, however, acquired about 10 acres of land on his own but his brothers Chandrappa and Gadigeshappa were demanding a share out of this land as well and on account of this development, the relationship between the brothers had become strained. Chandrappa and Gadigeshappa also filed a suit seeking a share in the 10 acres acquired by Thimmappa with the result that the relation between the brothers was further strained. At about 4 p.m. on 1.8.1993, Thimmappa told his wife Bhagyavathi that he had learnt that Chandrappa and Gadigeshappa had gone to the field to pluck coconuts and that he was going to prevent them from doing so. Thimmappa and his brother Devendrappa PW3 then left for the fields on a scooter. A few minutes later Rathnamma PW2, sister-in-law of Bhagyavathi PW-1 came to her house and informed her that she had seen Chandrappa and Gadigeshappa accompanied by their brother-in-law Hanumanthappa, Shiva and Siddeshappa along with Bhoomesha and Manja proceeding towards the field armed with Choppers and sickles and she apprehended some danger. Bhagyavathi and Rathnamma then left for the field and as they reached the outer fencing at about 4.30 p.m., they saw all the accused as well as Bhoomesha and Manja assaulting Thimmappa with sickles and choppers. PW3 Devendrappa went to the rescue of his brother but he too was assaulted and having sustained an injury he ran away towards the village. PWs1 and 2 thereafter entered the garden and saw that Thimmappa was lying grievously injured near the Samadhi adjoining the land. The accused Siddeshappa and Hanumanthappa also abused and assaulted the two women. PW4 Prashanth Kumar, who was attracted to the place, rushed in with some water which he attempted to put into Thimmappas mouth but he succumbed to his injuries at the spot. PW3 Devendrappa was also taken to the Bhadravathi hospital by PW11 Rudrappa whereas PWs.1,2 and 4 stood near the dead body. It was also noticed that the accused while running away had left behind a sickle and a club near the dead body. An FIR was got registered by PW1 Bhagyavathi at about 11.45 p.m. at the Police Station. The investigation was taken over by Inspector M.I. Jameel PW20 who visited the scene of occurrence on 2nd August 1993 at about 6.30 a.m. and prepared the inquest report and recorded the statements of the witnesses and picked up the sickle and club in the presence of witnesses. His efforts to trace out the accused were, however, not successful till the 3rd August 1993 when he arrested four of them. Accused No.2 was arrested on 10.9.1993. He also visited the Government Hospital Bhadravathi on the same day and seized the blood stained clothes of injured PW3 Devendrappa. Several weapons of offence were also recovered on the interrogation of the accused. On the completion of the investigation, the accused were charged for offences punishable under sections 143, 147,148,302 and 324 read with 149 of the IPC.

3. The prosecution in support of its case relied primarily on the statements of the four eye witnesses PW1 Bhagyavathi, wife of the deceased, her sister-in-law PW2 Rathnamma, PW3 Devendrappa an injured witness and brother of the deceas



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top