TARUN CHATTERJEE, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Board of Trustees – Appellant
Versus
Macgregor Navire Port Equipment A. B. – Respondent
ORDER
1. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay is the appellant before us.
2. The aforesaid appeal arises out of a suit filed by respondent No.1 (Macgregor Navire Port Equipment A.B.) against the appellant and also against respondent No.2, inter alia, for an injunction restraining the appellant from encashing a bank guarantee issued by the bank at the instance of the respondent No.1. After some arguments were advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, our attention was drawn to an order of this Court dated 3rd of August, 2001 from which it appears that the appellant had invoked the bank guarantee on 29th of March, 1988. However, the bank chose not to make the payment and in fact on 28th of April, 1988, the High Court granted stay of encashment of the bank guarantee. This Court in that order also noted that the bank guarantee in question had expired on 24th of February, 1989. This Court while passing the aforesaid order made the following direction :
"............pending hearing of the appeal, it shall pay to the appellant the amount of the bank guarantee which was invoked on 29th of March, 1988 along with interest at the rate of 18% with quarterly rests wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.