SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 297

TARUN CHATTERJEE, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Board of Trustees – Appellant
Versus
Macgregor Navire Port Equipment A. B. – Respondent


ORDER

1. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay is the appellant before us.

2. The aforesaid appeal arises out of a suit filed by respondent No.1 (Macgregor Navire Port Equipment A.B.) against the appellant and also against respondent No.2, inter alia, for an injunction restraining the appellant from encashing a bank guarantee issued by the bank at the instance of the respondent No.1. After some arguments were advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, our attention was drawn to an order of this Court dated 3rd of August, 2001 from which it appears that the appellant had invoked the bank guarantee on 29th of March, 1988. However, the bank chose not to make the payment and in fact on 28th of April, 1988, the High Court granted stay of encashment of the bank guarantee. This Court in that order also noted that the bank guarantee in question had expired on 24th of February, 1989. This Court while passing the aforesaid order made the following direction :

"............pending hearing of the appeal, it shall pay to the appellant the amount of the bank guarantee which was invoked on 29th of March, 1988 along with interest at the rate of 18% with quarterly rests wi



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top