SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 649

B.N.AGARWAL, P.P.NAOLEKAR, D.K.JAIN
SAHARA INDIA (FIRM), LUCKNOW – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL-I – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

D.K. JAIN, J.:

Leave granted.

2. These matters have been placed before the three-Judge Bench in view of a common order dated 14th December, 2006, passed by a two-Judge Bench of this Court. The Order reads as follows:

"When the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on a decision of this Court in Rajesh Kr. & Ors. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, before any direction can be issued under Section 142 (2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) for special audit of the accounts of the assessee, there has to be a pre-decisional hearing and an opportunity has to be granted to the assessee for the purpose. A close reading of the decision shows that the observations in this regard appear to have been made in the context of the assessments in terms of Section 158 BC (Block Assessment) of the Act. Such assessments are relatable to a case when raid has been conducted at the premises of an assessee. Had that been so, limited to the facts involved in that case, we would have negatived the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner. But, certain observations of general nature hav











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top