2008 (9) SC 499
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.B. Sinha And Cyriac Joseph, JJ.
Rajiv Arora- Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors.- Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5306 OF 2008
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5307 OF 2008
Decided On: August 29, 2008
Force Officer act, 1950 - Section 45 - Air Force Rules - Rule 43 - Premature retirement - A contention was raised as regards sustainability of first three charges on ground that as witnesses named therein were not produced for cross-examination purpose of continuing the General Court Martial proceedings became frustrated same was rejected - Held, High Court in its impugned judgment proceeded to consider issue on a technical plea no prejudice has been caused to appellant by such non-examination - If basic principles of law have not been complied with or there has been a gross violation of the principles of natural justice High Court should have exercised its jurisdiction of judicial review - Before a court martial proceeding is convened legal requirements therefore must be satisfied - Satisfaction of the officer concerned must be premised on a finding that evidence justified a trial on those charges - Such a satisfaction cannot be arrived at without any evidence - Appeals are Allowed
JUDGMENT
S.B.SINHA, J.
Leave granted.
2. While appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 3385 of 2007 is directed against a judgment and order dated 16.11.2006 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi whereby and whereunder a writ petition filed by the appellant herein questioning the validity of a Court Martial proceeding has been dismissed, appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.5916 of 2007 is directed against the order dated 19th December, 2006 passed in the review petition.
3. We may, before adverting to the contentions raised by the parties, notice the admitted fact of the matter.
4. Appellant was commissioned in the Indian Air Force on or about 6.12.1985. He filed an application for posting to MOFT Unit so as to enable him to fly MIG 21 Fighter Aircrafts. The said application was rejected. He applied for premature retirement. A good conduct certificate was issued in his favour. However, a disciplinary proceeding was initiated against him on or about 20.1.2006 in respect whereof a charge-sheet was issued on 1.4.2006, the details whereof are as under :
________________________________________________________________________
"FIRST CHARGE SECTION 65 AIR AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD FORCE ACT, 1950 ORDER AND AIR FORCE DISCIPLINE
At New Delhi on the night of 28/29 Apr. 05,
improperly introduced himself as husband of
Mrs. Ambika Singhania to Head Constable
Ranbir and Constable Dharmendeer,
Police Personnel of Delhi Police,
knowing such statement to be false.
SECOND CHARGE SECTION 45 BEHAVING IN A MANNER UNBE-
FORCE OFFICER ACT, 1950 COMING THE POSITION AND CHAR-
ACTER OF AN OFFICER
In that He,
At New Delhi on the night of 28/29 Apr 05
used offensive language to Sh. Dependra
Pathak, Deputy Commissioner of Police,
South West District, New Delhi and behaved
In a riotous manner.
THIRD CHARGE SECTION 48 INTOXICATION
AIR FORCE ACT, 1950 In that he,
AT New Delhi on the night of 28/29 Apr 05
was found in a state of intoxication.
SIXTH CHARGE SECTION 45 ASSAUTING HIS SUPERIOR
AIR FORCE OFFICER ACT, 1950 OFFICER
At Gandhinagar (Gujarat), on 06 Jan.06
assaulted Gp.Capt. SS Kothari (16788) F(P)
of Headquarter South Western Air
Command, Indian Air Force.
SIXTH CHARGE SECTION 45 BEHAVING IN A MANNER UNBE-
AIR FORCE OFFICER ACT, 1950 COMING THE POSITION AND CHAR-
OF AN OFFICER
At Gandhinagar (Gujarat), on 06 Jan.06,
at Officers Mess Headquarter South
Western Air Command, Indian Air Force
used offensive language to 707519 Sergeant
Narender Kumar, Catering Assistant of
Headquarter South Western Air Command,
Indian Air Force and behaved in a riotous
manner.
SEVENTH CHARGE SECTION 47 ILL TREATING A PERSON
AIR FORCE ACT,1950 (ALTERNATIVE SUBJECT TO THE AIR FORCE
TO SIXTH CHARGE) ACT BEING HIS SUBORDINATE
IN RANK
At Gandhinagar (Gujarat), on
06 Jan.06, at the Officers Mess
Headquarter South Western Air
Command Indian Air Force, ill-tread
707518 Sergeant Narender Kumar
Catering Assistant of Headquarter
Western Air Command, Indian Air Force."
________________________________________________________________________
5. A convening order was issued for trial by a General Court Martial on 8.5.2006.
6. A contention was raised as regards sustainability of the first three charges, inter alia, on the ground that as the witnesses named therein were not produced for cross-examination, the purpose of continuing the General Court Martial proceedings became frustrated. The same was rejected.
7. He filed an application for substitution of the Judge Advocate. It was also disallowed.
8. On the aforementio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.