S.B.SINHA, V.S.SIRPURKAR
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
PALA RAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
S.B. Sinha, J.
Leave granted.
2. The case has a chequered history.
Appellant has been constituted under the Food Corporation of India Act, 1964. For the purpose of carrying out its activities, it maintains a large number of godowns in different parts of the country including the States of Punjab and Haryana. As the law stood then, the respective State Governments were considered to be the appropriate Government in respect of the appellant. Various State Governments issued Notification prohibiting employment of contract labour in some processes in its establishments purported to be in exercise of its power under Section 10(1) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (for short, "the Act").
Indisputably, the Government of India in exercise of the same power issued a Notification bearing No. S.O. No. 779(E) on or about 9.12.1976 to the following effect:
"S.O. No. 779(E) - In exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (37 of 1970) the Central Government after consultation with the Central Advisory Contract Labour Board, hereby prohibits employment of contract labour on and from
Air India Statutory Corporation and Ors. v. United Labour Union and ors.
Bharat Heavy Electric Ltd. v. E.S.I. Corporation
Steel Authority of India Limited and ors. v. National Union Waterfront Workers and ors.
Referred to : Food Corporation of India Workers Union v. Food Corporation of India and ors.
Secretary, State of Karnataka and others v. Umadevi and others
Secretary, State of Karnataka and others vs. Umadevi and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.