SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1083

ALTAMAS KABIR, MARKANDEY KATJU
H. U. D. A – Appellant
Versus
Raj Singh Rana – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Altamas Kabir,J.

1. Leave granted.

2. One Baldev Singh Nagar was allotted residential plot No.718 (later on re- numbered 883) measuring 14 marlas in Sector 13 of the Urban Estate at Karnal under the provisions of the Punjab Urban Estate (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964, which was repealed by the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1997. The said plot was subsequently transferred to the respondent herein, Shri Raj Singh Rana, as will be evident from the letter dated 22.3.1974 addressed to the respondent by the Estate Officer, Urban Estate, Karnal. In the said letter various conditions have been set out in respect of the said allotment, of which we are concerned with the condition nos. 1,2,3,4,8 and 15, which are reproduced hereinbelow:

"From

The Estate Officer,

Urban Estate,

Karnal.

Transferred vide Memo No.E.O.(M)- 76/5235

Dated 01.10.1976 with condition No.16

To

Shri R.S.Rana

S/o Shri A.S.Rana,

V.P.O. Garhi

Distt. Sonepat.

Memo No.1664/718/14/E.O/K

Dated : 22.3.1974

Subject : Allotment of Residential plot in the Urban Estate, Karnal.

Reference your application dated 25.9.1971 for the allotment of residential plot in the Urban Estate at Karnal.

1. Plot No.718 measuring 14







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top