SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 625

TARUN CHATTERJEE & HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Hakam Singh - PETITIONER
Versus
State of Haryana and Others - RESPONDENT:
Civil Appeal No 2699 of 2008
[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (c) 6347 of 2007]
With
Civil Appeal No 2700 of 2008
[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) 6427 of 2007]
Mohinder Kaur (D) by LRs. & Ors. - Appellants
Vs.
State of Haryana & Ors. - Respondents
With
Civil Appeal No2701 of 2008
[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (c) 6348 of 2007]
Nasib Singh & Ors. - Appellants
Vs.
State of Haryana and Ors. - Respondents
Decided On : 09/04/2008

Headnote:Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27 - Additional evidence in appellate court - Application for acceptance of additional evidence filed in first appeal before the High Court - Appeals disposed of without considering those applications - impugned order set aside - Matter remitted back to the High Court for fresh decision of the appeals along with application for acceptance of additional evidence. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

1. Leave granted.

2. In spite of due service and opportunity to contest the appeal, no one has entered appearance in the appeal or contested the appeal at the time of hearing.

3. These appeals, by way of Special Leave, are filed against a final Judgment and order dated 26th of July 2006 passed in Regular First Appeal Nos. 22, 185 and 217 of 1989 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, by which the First Appeals, filed at the instance of the appellant, were dismissed which were filed for enhancement of compensation for the land acquired by the respondents.

4. Without going into the facts in detail, these appeals can be disposed of on a very short point. It is an admitted position that an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure (In short "CODE") for acceptance of additional evidence was filed before the High Court in the aforesaid First Appeals, which were dismissed by the High Court by the impugned order. However, the application for acceptance of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CODE was not considered by the High Court while disposing of the appeal.

5. That being the position, without going into the legality and propriety of the impugned order of the High Court passed in the aforesaid appeals, we set aside the same and remit back the cases to the High Court for decision of the Appeals afresh on merits and in accordance with law along with the application for acceptance of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CODE.

6. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside. The High Court is requested to dispose of the First Appeals in the light of the observations and directions made hereinabove within three months from the date of supply of a copy of this Order along with application for acceptance of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CODE.

7. It is expected that the parties shall not be entitled to ask for adjournments on unsatisfactory grounds.

8. For the reasons aforesaid, the appeals are allowed to the extent indicated above. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top