2009(1) Supreme 535
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Dr. Arijit Pasayat and Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ.
Mukhtiar Singh & Anr. — Appellants
versus
State of Punjab — Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 448 of 2007
Decided on : 20-01-2009
(2003) 11 SCC 241 – Relied upon.
Facts of the case:
1. A land dispute had been going on between Mukhtiar Singh and his brother Babu Singh (‘deceased’) which had ended in favour of the deceased.
2. Mukhtiar Singh was aggrieved thereby. His two sons Gurmail Singh and Harbans Singh had caused injuries to the deceased which resulted into fracture of his leg and thereafter Harbans Singh son of Mukhtiar Singh was murdered by deceased and his son Buta Singh.
3. On 15.04.1994, the deceased and his family members decided to visit Bathinda jail where the son of the deceased was lodged. At Kahangarh Railway Station at about 5:00 AM when they were waiting for the train, Mukhtiar Singh armed with a kirpan and his son Gurmail Singh armed with a takua came there.
4. They assaulted the deceased as a result of which he fell down. Mukhtiar Singh accused exclaimed that they had avenged murder of his son.
5. The trial Court acquitted both the accused.
6. On appeal by the State the High Court set aside the order of the trial Court.
Finding of the Court :
High Court was justified in setting aside the order of acquittal.
Result : Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT
Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. —
1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and order of the Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court, allowing the appeal filed by the respondent State. By the impugned judgment the Division Bench set aside the order of acquittal passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bhatinda and convicted both the appellants for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’). The appellants-accused were sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each with default stipulation.
2. The prosecution version as unfolded during the trial is as follows:
A land dispute had been going on between Mukhtiar Singh and his brother Babu Singh (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased’) which had ended in favour of the deceased. Mukhtiar Singh was aggrieved thereby. His two sons Gurmail Singh and Harbans Singh had caused injuries to the deceased which resulted into fracture of his leg and thereafter Harbans Singh son of Mukhtiar Singh was murdered by deceased and his son Buta Singh. On 15.04.1994, the deceased and his family members which included his wife Surjit kaur, son Makhan Singh, daughter-in-law Jasvir Kaur and father-in-law of daughter of deceased Balwant Singh decided to visit Bathinda jail where the son of the deceased was lodged. In order to catch a train to Bathinda they reached Kahangarh Railway Station which was next to their village at about 5:00 AM and waited there for the arrival of the Train. Since the train was late from its scheduled time the ticket counter at the Station was closed. Except the deceased all had seated themselves on a bench while the deceased was standing nearby. In the meantime Mukhtiar Singh armed with a kirpan and his son Gurmail Singh armed with a takua came there. Mukhtiar Singh gave two kirpan blows one on the neck of the deceased and another on his head. Consequently, he fell down. Immediately thereafter Gurmail Singh gave blows on the chin, right shoulder, left shoulder and chest of the deceased. The family members of the deceased raised an alarm. Mukhtiar Singh accused exclaimed that they had avenged murder of his son.
One SPO Gurdas Singh who was posted on the Assault Post, Kahangarh Railway Station came running and challenged the accused but both the accused managed to escape. A wireless message was received in the railway station Bathinda at 11:50 AM upon which ASI Gurdip Singh accompanied by other police officials reached the Kahangarh Railway Station where he found Surjit Kaur, Makhan Singh, Jasvir kaur, Balwant Singh and SPO Gurdas Singh present. He prepared the inquest report Ex. PC which was attested by Surjit Kaur and Makhan Singh. Thereafter statement Ex. PM, of Surjit Kaur was recorded at 5.15 PM, on which he made an endorsement Ex. PM/1, upon which formal FIR EX. PM/2 was registered in the concerned Police Station. The ASI Gurdip Singh went to the spot, lifted the blood stained earth and put it into a container. After sealing the same, the container was taken into possession vide recovery memo Ex. PK which was attested by the witnesses.
SPO Gurdas Singh also produced a pair of shoes which was taken into possession vide memos Ex.P.U. and a sum of Rs. 165/- which was recovered from the person of the deceased. A rough site plan Ex.PR of the place of occurrence was prepared by the Investigating Officer. The autopsy on the dead body of the deceased was conducted on the next day (16.4.1994) by Dr. Kuldip Rai.
Thereafter, Sub-Inspector Hukam Chand arrested both the accused on 20.4.1994. The investigation was taken up by ASI Gurdip Singh and during interrogation accused Mukhtiar Singh suffered a disclosure statement Ex.PU about concealing of kirpan and blood stained clothes. Thereafter, the accused Mukhtiar Singh got recovered his kirpan and blood stained clothes. Kirpan was taken into possessin vide memo Ex.P.U./1 and its sketch Ex.P.U./2 was also prepared. The blood stained
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.