VISCOUNT HALDANE, LORD PHILLIMORE, LORD CARSON
ADCOCK, ASHDOWN AND COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF REVENUE-AUTHORITY, BOMBAY – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 62 of 1922) from an order of the High Court (October 21, 1920) discharging a rule nisi obtained by the appellants for an order under s. 45 of the Specific Relief Act (I. of 1877).
Law Rep. 50 Ind. App. 227 ( 1922- 1923) Adcock, Ashdown and C o. Ltd v. C hief Revenue-Authority
64
The appellants were assessed by the collector of income tax to excess profits duty for the accounting period of twelve months ending on December 31, 1918, at Rs.8,79,582. For the purpose of the assessment they had elected to have the standard profits of the business ascertained under s. 6, sub-s. 1 (b) (iii.), of the Excess Profits Duty Act (X. of 1919). They applied to the Chief Revenue-authority to discharge the assessment under s. 23 of the Indian Income Tax Act (VII. of 1918), as applied by s. 15 of the Excess Profits Duty Act, 1919, on the ground that a deduction ought to have been made in accordance with the first proviso to s. 6, sub-s. 1 (6), of the Excess Profits Duty Act, 1919, in computing the profits chargeable on account of an increase of average capital employed in the business at the end of the accounting period, or in the alternative to state a case for the opinion of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.