SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1929 Supreme(SC) 103

SIR BINOD MITTER, VISCOUNT SUMNER, LORD THANKERTON
ATTA MOHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
THE KING-EMPEROR – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellant:T. L. Wilson & Co. Solicitor for respondent: Solicitor, India Office.

Judgement

Appeal (No. 9 of 1928) by special leave from a judgment of the High Court (April 29, 1929) which confirmed a judgment of the Sessions Judge at Mianwali (February 1, 1929) convicting the appellant of murder and sentencing him to death.

The material facts appear from the judgment of the Judicial Committee.

Special leave to appeal was granted by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Darling and Lord Tomlin on July 29, 1929. (The terms of the charge, and other material particulars of the case, were not fully before the Board. It appeared that an adjournment of the hearing of the petition over the long vacation might cause delay which would be avoided by granting special leave.—A. M. T.)

1929. Dec. 6. Morey for the appellant. Under s. 221, sub-ss. 1 and 4, of the Code of Criminal Procedure the appellant was entitled to have all the sections under which he was charged clearly stated. He was charged only under ss. 149 and 34 of the Penal Code, which relate respectively to unlawful assembly and the acts done by several persons in furtherance of a common intention. All the other accused being acquitted the appellant could not be convicted under the charge as framed. There was no reference to













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top