LORD ATKIN, LORD MACMILLAN, SIR JOHN WALLIS
BAGESWARI CHARAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KUMAR KAMAKHYA NARAIN SINGH – Respondent
Judgement
Law Rep. 58 Ind. App. 9 ( 1930- 1931) Bageswari C haran Singh V. Kumar Kamakhya Narain Singh 161
Appeal (No. 47 of 1928) from a decree of the High Court (January 21, 1927) reversing a decree of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Hazaribagh (December 22, 1922).
The plaintiff-respondent, who was zamindar of the Ramgarh estate, instituted a suit against the appellant (who was defendant No. 10),his grandfather Jado Charan Singh (defendant No. 1, since deceased), and other members of the appellants family. The plaint claimed a declaration that the defendants had no right to the minerals underlying villages mentioned therein, an injunction, and further relief. The respondents case was that the villages in question constituted a rent-paying jagir held by the defendants under a grant from one of the respondents ancestors. In the record-of-rights made in 1915 under the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908, the tenure had been so recorded. The appellant by his statement of defence denied that the villages were a part of the respondents zamindari and contended that they had been acquired by his ancestor by force of arms and that he was proprietor and entitled to the underlying minerals.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.