LORD CARSON, LORD ATKINSON, LORD BUCKMASTER, SIR JOHN EDGE
B HAIDAS SHIVDAS – Appellant
Versus
BAI GULAB – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 123 of 1919) from a judgment and decree of the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction, affirming a decree of the High Court in its original civil jurisdiction.
The suit related to the will of Nathoo Moolji, a Gujarati Hindu who died on December 8, 1894, and to the respective estates and interests taken by the testators widow &nd his two daughters. The material terms of the will appear from the judgment of the Judicial Committee.
The suit was brought by the appellant, as heir of the testators daughter Diwali who died in 1906. The daughter Jamnabai took possession of the estate upon the death of the testators widow, and remained in possession until her death in 1911, whereupon the respondents came into possession and took out letters of administration to her estate.
The appeal came before the Board originally in February, 1921, and was then allowed upon a question of procedure (see L. R. 48 I. A. 181). Subsequently the appeal was restored to the list by consent for trial upon the merits.
The views of the learned judges before whom the suit and appeals were heard in India were shortly as follows. The trial judge (Macleod J.) held that the widow took only a Hind
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.