SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1920 Supreme(SC) 49

SIR JOHN EDGE, LORD ATKINSON, LORD BUCKMASTER, AMEER ALI
CHARAN DAS – Appellant
Versus
AMIR KHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellants:Young, Jackson, Beard & King. Solicitor for respondents: E. Dalgado.

Judgement

Consolidated Appeals and cross-appeals from two judgments and consequent decrees of the Court of the Judicial Commissioner; the first (December 23, 1915) reversing a judgment of the Divisional Judge, Peshawar, which affirmed a judgment of the Subordinate Judge, Mardan ; the second (January 26, 1917) dismissing appeals from the Subordinate Judge after a remand.

The suits giving rise to the appeals were brought by the respondents. By their respective plaints each respondent stated that his claim was " for a declaration of pre-emption right " in a share of the village Tazagram in the Peshawar district. Each plaint in fixing the value of the suit for Court fees stated that it was a " declaratory suit," and the Court fee paid in each case was Rs. 10. The appellants, who were the vendees of the properties sought to be preempted, were defendants ; the vendors, the recorded proprietors of the village, also were defendants.

The defendants pleaded (inter alia) that "a further relief— namely, for possession of land—being open to the plaintiffs, their present suit for a mere declaration cannot lie (vide Specific Relief Act, 1877, s. 42)." The plaintiffs (respondents) by their replica


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top