SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(SC) 33

LORD GODDARD, SIR MADHAVAN NAIR, SIR JOHN BEAUMONT
CHAINCHAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KING-EMPEROR – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellant:Douglas Grant & Dold. Solicitor for respondent: Solicitor, India Office.

Judgement

Appeal (No. 8i of 1944), by special leave, from a judgment of the High Court (April 20, 1944) dismissing an appeal from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge of Amritsar (January 21, 1944) convicting the appellant of murder under s. 302 read with s. 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

The following facts are taken from the judgment of the Judicial Committee. The appellant was charged before the Additional Sessions Judge along with thirteen others with the murder of one Sohan Singh. The Sessions Judge convicted seven of the prisoners and sentenced them all to death, and acquitted the remaining seven. All the convicted persons appealed, and the High Court (Beckett and

A. N. Bhandari JJ.) upheld the conviction and sentence on the appellant; they upheld the conviction of one other of the prisoners but substituted a sentence of transportation for life for that of death, and quashed the convictions of the other appellants.

The murder took place at the Gorewala well, in the village of Mianpur, where the murdered man was lying on a cot. There were several persons called who alleged that they were eye witnesses. Among them was a "patwari," Lachhman Das, who happened to be at the v











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top