LORD BUCKMASTER, VISCOUNT DUNEDIN, LORD TOMLIN, SIR GEORGE LOWNDES, SIR BINOD MITTER
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY PRESIDENCY – Appellant
Versus
BOMBAY TRUST CORPORATION, LIMITED – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 37 of 1929) from a judgment and order of the High Court (March 13, 1928) upon a reference under s.66, sub-s.2, of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
The following facts appeared from the reference and the documents annexed thereto. The Hong Kong Trust Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "the Hong Kong Company ") was incorporated in Hong Kong with the object of carrying on the business of bankers and financiers, and was resident in Hong Kong. The respondent company was incorporated as a private company at Bombay with similar
Law. Rep. 57 Ind. App. 49 ( 1929- 1930) Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay v. Bombay Trust
215
objects. During the years of assessment—namely, those ending on March 31, 1925 and 1926—the Hong Kong company had lent to the respondent company large sums on deposit at 5J per cent, interest. The advances constituted substantially the whole of the available capital of the Hong Kong Company, including both its paid up capital and money deposited with it. The respondent company remitted the interest due to the Hong Kong Company.
Under a notice pursuant to s. 43 of the Act served on the respondent company, it was held that that company was to be d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.