SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1916 Supreme(SC) 12

SIR LAWRENCE JENKINS, SIR JOHN EDGE, LORD SHAW OF DUNFERMLINE
DEBI BAKHSH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SHADI LAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellant: T. L. Wilson & Co.

Judgement

Appeal from a judgment and decree of the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh (November 12, 1913) affirming an order of the Subordinate Judge of Bahraich (June 4, 1913).

Maneshwar Bakhsh Singh, while his property was under the superintendence of the Court of Wards under the Oudh Land Revenue Act (XVII. of 1876), borrowed certain money from the respondents. The property was released from superintendence in 1898. The respondents subsequently instituted a suit to recover the amount due, and after protracted litigation obtained a decree. Meanwhile, in 1911, Maneshwar Bakhsh Singh died and was succeeded by his son, the present appellant. In 1913 the respondents applied to the Subordinate Judge of Bahraich for execution of their decree by the sale of a village which had formed part of the property under superintendence. The appellant objected, relying upon s. 174 of the Oudh Land Revenue Act, 1876, but his objection was disallowed. Upon appeal to the Court of the Judicial Commissioner the decision of the Subordinate Judge was affirmed. Sects. 173 and 174 of the Act are set out in the judgment.

1916. March 13. De Gruyther, K.C., and Kyffin, for the appellant. Upon the true

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top