SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1893 Supreme(SC) 11

LORD WATSON, LORD MORRIS, SIR RICHARD COUCH, GEORGE DENMAN
EX PARTE MACREA – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for Petitioner: Ranken Ford, Ford, & Chester.

Judgement

This was a petition for special leave to appeal from a conviction by the High Court, dated the 13th of June, 1892, under sects. 511 and 420 of the Penal Code.

It stated that the Petitioner had been convicted of (1.) an attempt to cheat and thereby fraudulently to induce the Comp troller-General to deliver to him or to Asad Ali a Government promissory note, No. 9764, for Bs.500, and pay the accrued interest thereon ; (2.) conspiracy with Asad Alt with that object; (3.) abetment of an attempt by Asad Ali; and had been sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment.

An application had been made on the 1st of December, 1892, under sect. 32 of the High Court Charter of 1866, that the Petitioners case might be declared a fit and proper one for appeal to Her Majesty on the ground that the jury had been misdirected to the effect that the acts covered by the evidence amounted to an attempt at cheating within the meaning of the Penal Code, and had been refused.

The charge related to a lost Government promissory note for Rs.500, No. 9764, with arrears of interest thereon from 1865, which belonged to the representatives of one Mirza Husain Ali, and was to the effect that the Petitioner


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top