SIR JOHN BEAUMONT, SIR MADHAVAN NAIR, LORD THANKERTON, LORD DU PARCQ, LORD UTHWATT
GHANTA CHINA RAMASUBBAYYA – Appellant
Versus
MOPARTHI CHENCHURAMAYYA, MINOR, – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 2 of 1944) from a judgment and decree of the High Court (April 22, 1941) which had reversed a judgment and decree of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Baptala (January 31, 1939).
The following facts are taken from the judgment of the Judicial Committee. The plaintiffs were the appellants before the Board. The appeal arose out of a suit to set aside an adoption. The following genealogical table shows the relationship of the persons concerned in the appeal—
Law Rep. 74 Ind. App. 162 ( 1946- 1947) Ghanta China Ramasubbayya V. Moparthi Chenchuramayya, Minor 108
Moparthi Venkayya | || Perayya Pitchayya | (wife Pullamma, died | 19th June, 1937) || | Venkayya Punnayya (died)
(died) | wife) Purmamma
| | (m. Ghanta Pitchayya)
| |
| | | | |
Rangayya Ramasubbayva Perayya Ramasubbayya Rangayya
1st Defendant) 2nd Respondent | | | (4th Defendant) 4th Respondent (died) (Ghanta) (1st Plaintiff) 1st Appellant (Ghanta) (2nd Plaintiff) 2nd Appellant
| |
Punnayya Chenchura-m
(2nd ayya
Defendant) (3rd
3rd Defendant)
Respondent 1st
Respondent
The parties were governed by the Mitakshara school of Hindu law as administered in the Andhra country, in the Madras Presidency. Moparthi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.