SIR WALTER PHILLIMORE, AMEER ALI, VISCOUNT HALDANE, SIR JOHN EDGE
HET RAM – Appellant
Versus
SHADI LAL – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court (May 13, 1913) varying a decree of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Moradabad.
The appellant, in 1883, purchased immovable property which was subject to a simple mortgage made in 1880 in favour of one Lachman Das, and to further mortgage made in 1881 in favour of the first respondent, and took possession.
In 1895 Lachman Das obtained against the mortgagor and the appellant a decree absolute for sale under s. 83 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1884, upon his mortgage of 1880. The first respondent was not made a defendant to the suit although his mortgage of 1881 was duly registered. Later in 1892 Lachman Das died, without having executed the decree, and was succeeded by the appellant as heir. The appellant took no steps under the decree.
Law Rep. 45 Ind. App. 130 ( 1917- 1918)
Het Ram V. Shadi Lal 44
In 1910 the first respondent instituted the present suit against the mortgagors, the appellant, and other transferees of the property mortgaged (now joined as respondents), for a sale decree under his mortgage of 1880.
The trial judge made a decree for sale, but ordered that the sale should be subject to the prior mortgag
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.