VISCOUNT HALDANE, LORD ATKINSON, SIR JOHN EDGE
JAGANNATHA BHEEMA DEO – Appellant
Versus
KUNJA BEHARI DEO – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 55 of 1920) from a judgment and decree of the High Court (September 12, 1918) affirming a decree of the District Judge of Ganjam.
The suit was brought in 1916 by the appellant, claiming to be the adopted son of Brojo Kishore Deo who died on September 3, 1906, to obtain possession of the estate. The deceased was a Hindu governed by the Mitakshara, and on August 14, 1906, had executed a document headed by a statement that it was a will in favour of the executants wife, and proceeding in the terms set out in the judgment of the Judicial Committee. In 1915 the widow adopted the appellant to her deceased husband. The power to adopt, according to the case made in the plaint, was given orally, also by the document above mentioned. The defendant by his written statement denied that any authority to adopt was given, and contended that the document was not a will but a mere power to adopt, and as such required registration under s. 17 of the Indian Registration Act, 1877 ; he pleaded further [@ page
Law. Rep. 48 Ind. App. 482 ( 1920- 1921) Jagannatha Bheema Deo V. Kunja Behari Deo
239
LRIA 483] that the estate had vested in him before the adoption was made and was not d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.