SIR JOHN BEAUMONT, LORD MACDERMOTT, LORD PORTER
JOY CHAND LAL BABU – Appellant
Versus
KAMALAKSHA CHAUDHURY – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 70 of 1947) from an order of the High Court passed in its civil revisional jurisdiction (August 13, 1943) which set aside an order of the Subordinate Judge of Burdwan (July 18, 1942) rejecting the petition of the respondents Nos. 1 to 10 under ss. 30 and 36, sub-s. 6 (a) (ii), of the Bengal Money Lenders Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as " the " Act "), for reopening a mortgage decree dated October 5, 1931, passed against the respondents in mortgage suit No. 198 of 1930.
The following facts are taken from the judgment of the Judicial Committee. The questions argued on this appeal were first, a preliminary objection taken by the respondents that this appeal was incompetent; secondly, a preliminary objection taken by the appellant that the revision application to the
Law Rep. 76 Ind. App. 131 ( 1948- 1949) Joy Chand Lal Babu V. Kamalaksha Chaudhury
67
High Court from which this appeal was brought was incompetent. Apart from those preliminary objections the only two matters urged against the order of the High Court appealed from were first, that the loan to which the application of the respondents related was a " commercial loan" to which the Act did not appl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.