SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1920 Supreme(SC) 59

LORD BUCKMASTER, AMEER ALI, LORD ATKINSON, SIR JOHN EDGE
KERWICK – Appellant
Versus
KERWICK – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellant :Wontners & Son. Solicitors for respondent: Bramall & White.

Judgement

Appeal from a judgment and decree of the Chief Court of Lower Burma (June 19, 1918) reversing a decree of Young J.

The appellant instituted the suit in the Chief Court against his wife, the respondent, praying for a declaration that two houses known as " Kildare " and " Kerry " in Rangoon were transferred to the respondent benami, and that the appellant was the true owner of them ; and for an order that the respondent should transfer the properties into the name of the appellant. By his plaint the appellant alleged that he had the two properties in question transferred into the respondents name benami, under the mistaken view that the rules of the Government department in which he was employed fettered his free action in the purchase of land, and that he had purchased the properties with the object of making provision for his children. The respondent by her written statement denied that either of the properties had been bought benami, and alleged that the appellant had bought the land and built the houses thereon for the purpose of making provision for her.

The trial judge (Young J.) delivered judgment for the plaintiff (appellant) as prayed, but that decision was reverse


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top