SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(SC) 4

LORD SHAW, SIR JOHN EDGE, AMEER ALI, LORD DUNEDIN
LAJWANTI – Appellant
Versus
SAFA CHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellants : H. S. L. Polak.
Solicitors for respondents: Ranken Ford & Chester.

Judgement

Appeal (No. 60 of 1922) from a decree of the Chief Court of the Punjab (March 23, 1917) reversing a decree of the District Judge of Gurdaspur (November 28, 1912).

The suit was brought by the first appellant in 1910 against the respondents to recover immovable properties which had formerly belonged to her father Jawahar Mal, who died in 1852. The circumstances in which the suit was brought appear from the judgment of the Judicial Committee.

The respondents by their written statement alleged that Jawahar Mal had a posthumous son, Hira Mal, and that they, as heirs to Hira Mal, had a better title than the plaintiff.

The District Judge found upon the evidence that it was not proved that there had ever been a posthumous son. He held that the parties were governed by the ordinary Hindu law, according to which the plaintiff was entitled to inherit her fathers estate upon the death of his widows. He, however, granted the plaintiff a decree for a half only of the property, being of opinion that it would be inequitable to deprive the defendants of the whole property.

On appeal to the Chief Court, the learned judges found that the existence of Hira Mal was established, that he was bo











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top