SIR LAWRENCE JENKINS, LORD SHAW, LORD CARSON, SIR JOHN EDGE, AMEER ALI
MA THAUNG – Appellant
Versus
MA THAN – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 10 of 1923) from a decree (October 25, 1921) of the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, reversing a decree (March 31, 1920) of the District Judge of Mandalay.
The suit was brought by the appellants, two of the children of U Nyein, a deceased Burman Buddhist, by his first wife, against the first respondent, Ma Than, the second wife of U Nyein, she having survived him without having children. The other five children by the first marriage were joined as respondents. The appellants claimed that upon the death of U Nyein they were entitled to a share of his property.
The facts appear from the judgment of the Judicial Committee.
The appellants by their plaint alleged that by Burmese Buddhist law Ma Than was entitled to a quarter only of the property which U Nyein brought to the marriage (called the " payin " property), and to two-thirds of the property acquired after her marriage (called the " lettetpwa " property) ; they claimed that they and the other children by the first marriage were entitled to share the residue.
The trial judge made a preliminary decree declaring that each of the plaintiffs was entitled to one-seventh of the " payin " property, and one forty-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.