SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1916 Supreme(SC) 52

LORD SHAW OF DUNFERMLINE, LORD BUCKMASTER, EARL LOREBURN
MAHOMED SYEDOL ARIFFIN – Appellant
Versus
YEOH OOI GARK – Respondent


Advocates:
Evide nce—Infancy—Date of Birth—Family Re cord—Admis s ibility— Illus trations to Statute —Straits Se ttle me nts Ordinance III. of 1893, and Indian Evide nce Act (I. of 1872), s. 32, s ub-s . 5, and Illus tration (l).
In an action in the Straits Settlements to recover the amount due upon certain mortgages the defendant pleaded that he was an infant when he executed them. As evidence in support of this plea there was tendered at the trial an entry recording the date of the defendants birth made by the defendants deceased father in a book in which he made similar entries with regard to his family :—
Held, that under the Straits Settlements Evidence Ordinance, 1893, s. 32, sub-s. 5, and having regard to illustration (l) to that section, the entry was admissible in evidence. (The section and illustrations reproduce the Indian Evidence Act s. 32.)
Illustrations appended to sections of a statute should be accepted, if that can be done, as being of relevance and value in construing the text ; they should be rejected as repugnant to the section only as the last resort of construction.

Judgement

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of the Straits Settlements (March 2, 1915) affirming the judgment at the trial.

The respondent sued the appellant in the Supreme Court of the Straits Settlements (Penang) to recover the principal and interest due under mortgages executed by the appellant in 1912 and 1913. The appellant pleaded that he was an infant at the time when he executed the mortgages. The respondent by his reply joined issue, and pleaded further that he was induced to lend upon the mortgages by the fraudulent misrepresentation of the appellant that he was then of age, and that if he was in fact then an infant the amount claimed was recoverable as damages. At the trial before Sercombe-Smith J. the appellants brother proved an entry in a book kept by the deceased father of the appellant and containing records of the births, deaths, and marriages of his family; this entry recorded that the appellant was born on September 17, 1895, according to which date he was between seventeen and eighteen when the mortgages were executed. There was no other evidence to establish the age of the appellant. The witness stated that the entry did not com





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top