LORD ATKIN, LORD THANKERTON, LORD CLAUSON, SIR GEORGE RANKIN, SIR MADHAVAN NAIR
MAHOMED SIDDIQUE YOUSUF – Appellant
Versus
OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE OF CALCUTTA – Respondent
Judgement
Law. Rep. 70 Ind. App. 93 ( 1942- 1943) Mahomed Siddique Yousuf V. Official Assignee of C alcutta
31
Consolidated Appeals (No. 54 of 1942), by special leave, from a judgment and two orders of the High Court in its appellate insolvency jurisdiction (December 17, 1940), which had dismissed an appeal from the Judge in Insolvency (July 25, 1940).
The following facts are taken substantially from the judgment of the Judicial Committee In 1938 one Ali Mohamed Hashim (hereafter called "the insolvent") had a claim for damages against a firm with whom he had dealings in shares, and by a written agreement of March 30, 1938, between the appellant and the insolvent the former agreed to advance money for the costs of the contemplated suit and to assist in the conduct of it, for which services he was to receive half the money recovered after deducting the advances. On April i, 1938, the suit was instituted, and on January 19, 1939, was decreed for Rs.6750 and interest. On January 20, 1939, by indenture of assignment, the insolvent assigned to the appellant the said decree in consideration (inter alia) of his discharge of all liabilities under the agreement of March 30, 1938, and Rs.iooo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.