SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1947 Supreme(SC) 5

PRIVY COUNCIL [ON APPEAL FROM THEEAST INDIES]
LORD WRIGHT, LORD PORTER, LORD UTHWATT, SIR MADHAVAN NAIR AND SIR JOHN BEAUMONT
MEGH RAJ - Appellant
Versus
ALLAH RAKHIA - Respondents
On Appeal from the Federal Court of India.
Decided On : Feb. 5, 1947.

Advocates:
Solicitors for appellants: Linklaters & Paines.
Solicitor for the Punjab Province: Solicitor, India Office.

Judgement

Appeal (No. 13 of 1946), by special leave, from a judgment and order of the Federal Court (April 10, 1942) dismissing an appeal from a judgment of a Full Bench of the High Court at Lahore (February 27, 1941).

The following facts and statutory provisions are taken from the judgment of the Judicial Committee. The question in this appeal was whether Punjab Act No. IV of 1938, entitled the Punjab Restitution of Mortgaged Lands Act, was void as being ultra vires of the Punjab legislature. The action was commenced by the appellants as mortgagees claiming a declaration that they were mortgagees in possession of certain lands therein specified, and that the defendants were not entitled to redeem without payment of the mortgage debt due under the mortgage deeds, and also an injunction to restrain the defen dants as mortgagors from prosecuting their petition for redemption of the lands in the Court of the Collector under the Punjab Act IV. of 1938 (hereinafter called the impugned Act) and for restitution of the lands under the provisions of the Act.

The object of the impugned Act was the relief of mortgagors by giving them restitution of the mortgaged premises on conditions more favourable than those under the mortgage deed, and by providing for a procedure before the Collector, which was more summary than that before the ordinary courts. The relevant sections of the impugned Act were as follows—

"3. (1) The expression land means land which is not occupied as the site of any building in a town or village and is occupied or let for agricultural purposes or for purposes subservient to agriculture or for pasture, and includes—

"(a) the sites of buildings and other structures on such land;

"(b) a share in the profits of an estate or holding;

“(c) any dues or any fixed percentage of the land revenue payable by an inferior landowner to a superior landowner;

"(d) a right to receive rent;

"(e) any right to water enjoyed by the owner or occupier of land as such;

"(f) any right of occupancy; and

"(g) all trees standing on such land."

"4. A mortgagor to whose land the provisions of this Act apply, may at any time present a petition to the Collector praying for restitution of possession of the land mortgaged. The petition shall be duly verified in the manner prescribed for such petitions.”

"7. (1) If the Collector finds that the mortgage is one to which this Act applies he shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any other enactment for the time being in force in cases where he finds that the value of the benefits enjoyed by the mortgagee, while in possession, equal or exceed twice the amount of the principal sum originally advanced under the mortgage, order in writing—

"(a) that the mortgage be extinguished, and, “(b) where the mortgagee is still in possession, that the mortgagor be put into possession of the mortgaged land as against the mortgagee and that the title deeds, if any, be restored to the mortgagor.

"(2.) If in cases to which this Act applies, the Collector finds that the value of the benefits enjoyed by the mortgagee while in possession is less than twice the amount of the principal sum originally advanced and some payment is still due to the mortgagee according to the terms of the mortgage, the Collector shall, by order in writing, and notwithstanding anything contained in any other enactment for the time being in force direct that the land be restored to the mortgagor and he be put into possession subject, however, to the payment of compensation by the mortgagor to the mortgagee at rates not exceeding the following scales—

"(i.) thirty times the land revenue assessed on the land at the time when it was mortgaged if the mortgagee has been in possession for a period exceeding thirty years but not exceeding forty years;

"(ii.) fifteen times the land revenue assessed on the land at the time when it was mortgaged if the mortgagee has been in possession for a period exceeding forty years but not exceeding fifty years;

"(iii.




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top