SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(SC) 45

LORD DUNEDIN, LORD CARSON, SIR JOHN EDGE
MAUNG DWE – Appellant
Versus
KHOO HAUNG SHEIN – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellants:Henry Hilbery & Son. Solicitor for respondents: A. M. Bramall.

Judgement

Appeal (No. 84 of 1923) from a decree {January 30, 1922) of the Chief Court of Lower Burma, reversing a decree (December 6, 1920) of the Additional District Judge of Tavoy.

The suit was instituted by the present respondents, Nos. 1 to 4, minors suing by their guardian, against the appellants and respondent No. 5, who was joined pro forma. The plaintiffs by their plaint alleged that Ma Shwe Kin was the third wife and surviving widow of one Khoo Shwe Goon deceased ; as step-grandchildren of Ma Shwe Kin they claimed administration of her estate, on the basis that as step-grandchildren they were entitled to her estate jointly with respondent No. 5, her stepson. The appellants were sued as having intermeddled with, and being in possession of, the estate.

The material facts appear from the judgment of the Judicial Committee.

Upon the grounds stated in that judgment the Additional District Judge at Tavoy dismissed the suit, but upon appeal the Chief Court made a decree for administration, on the basis that the plaintiffs jointly with defendant No. 5 were entitled to the whole of Ma Shwe Kins separate estate, and to one-half of her undivided share in the estate of her deceased mo

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top