SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1916 Supreme(SC) 86

LORD PARKER OF WADDINGTON, LORD SUMNER, SIR JOHN EDGE, SIR LAWRENCE JENKINS
MINA KUMARI BIBI – Appellant
Versus
BIJOY SINGH DUDHURIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for respondent: Watkins & Hunter.

Judgement

Appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court (March 26, 1912) reversing a judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge of Murshidabad (March 29, 1909).

The suit was instituted by the appellant against the respondent and one Chhatrapat Singh for a declaration that certain property-bought by the respondent at a sale in execution of a decree belonged to her at the date of the sale ; she also claimed possession and an injunction.

The appellant relied upon a purchase from the judgment debtor on July 15, 1907. The property had been attached on July 16, 1907, in execution of a decree obtained in 1901 against Chhatrapat Singh, the respondent being the decree-holder and, by leave of the Court, the auction purchaser. The property had been attached by the same decree-holder in 1902 under a decree obtained against Chhatrapat Singh in 1896. The facts as to the attachments appear fully from the judgment of their Lordships. Chhatrapat Singh did not appear in the proceedings.

The respondent by his written statement pleaded (inter alia) that the alleged purchase by the appellant was fraudulent and collusive, and relied further on the attachment in 1902.

Issues were framed of which

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top