LORD SHAW, AMEER ALI, SIR JOHN EDGE, LORD ATKINSON, LORD BLANESBURGH
MIDNAPUR ZAMINDARY COMPANY, LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
NARESH NARAYAN ROY – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 87 of 1923) from a decree of the High Court (January 17, 1921) affirming a decree of the Subordinate Judge of Nadia.
Law. Rep. 51 Ind. App. 293 ( 1923- 1924) Midnapur Zamindary C ompany, Limited V. Naresh Narayan Roy 84
The suit was brought by the first respondent on August 8, 1912, for partition of certain char lands in which he and the appellant company were co-sharers, for a declaration that the company had no jote right (as they claimed) in the lands, for possession and other relief.
The facts appear from the judgment of the Judicial Committee.
The Subordinate Judge made a decree substantially as prayed ; on appeal that decree was affirmed by the High Court (Woodroffe and Walmsley JJ.).
1924. March 17, 18. De Gruyther K.C. and Kenworthy Brown for the appellants.
Dunne K.C. and Wallach for the first respondents.
April 7. The judgment of their Lordships was delivered by
SIR JOHN EDGE. This is an appeal by the defendants, the Midnapur Zamindary Co., Ld., which will be hereafter referred to as the Midnapur Company, against a decree, dated January 17, 1921, of the High Court at Calcutta, which affirmed a decree, dated August 19, 1915, of the Subordinate Judge o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.