SIR JAMES WILLIAM COLVILE, MELLISH, JAMES, SIR ROBERT PHILLIMORE, SIR JOSEPH NAPIER
MOONSHEE AMEER ALI – Appellant
Versus
MAHARANEE INDERJEET SINGH, BABOO RAMKISHEN SINGH, RANEE ASMODHEE KOOER, RANEE SOONETH KOOUR, RUN AHADUR SINGH, MOODEYDHUR SINGH, LALL NARAIN SINGH, AND DEOPUTTEE NARAIN SINGH – Respondent
Judgement
In this appeal the suit was brought in the Court of the Civil Judge of Zillah Behar by Baboo Bischen Singh, Baboo Lall Narain Singh and Baboo Deoputtee Narain Singh and the Appellant, the first three parties claiming to be entitled as heirs to the estates belonging to the Tickaree Raj. The Appellant claimed as Purchaser of one-eighth portion of the rights of the other Plaintiffs in the property in suit.
The suit purported to be instituted under a Vakeeletnamah appointing a Pleader by virtue of a
14 M.I.A. 203 ( 1871- 1872) Moonshee Ameer Ali V. Maharanee Inderjeet Singh 30
Mookternamah, or power of Attorney, alleged to have been executed by the first Plaintiff, Baboo Bischen Singh.
The main question was, whether Baboo Bischen Singh, whose name appeared as the first Plaintiff in the suit, had executed the power of Attorney under which the suit had been instituted in his name. The other points raised were, whether he and his co-Plaintiffs Lall Narain and Deoputtee Narain Singh were heirs in reversion to the last Rajah of Tickaree, whose Widows three of the Respondents were, and as to Ranee Sooneth Koour, whether her deceased Husband had given her power to adopt a Son.
Mr. R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.