AMEER ALI, SIR JOHN EDGE, LORD CARSON, LORD BUCKMASTER, SIR LAWRENCE JENKINS
MUHAMMAD HAFIZ – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMAD ZAKARIYA – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 27 of 1920) from a judgment and decree (May 2, 1917) of the High Court reversing a decree of the Subordinate Judge of Agra.
The suit was brought in January, 1915, by the appellants and the respondents other than the first named respondent to recover Rs. 14,000 principal and Rs.3010 interest due under a mortgage bond dated September 14, 1910. They had in March, 1914, sued for the interest then due under the mortgage, and had obtained a decree. The defendants (now represented by the first respondent) pleaded that the suit could not be maintained having regard to Order n., r. 2, of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. The material provisions of the deed, and the facts of the case, appear from the
2 Law Rep. 49 Ind. App. 9 ( 1921- 1922) Muhammad Hafiz V. Muhammad Zakariya
303
judgment of the Judicial Committee.
The Subordinate Judge made a decree in favour of the plaintiffs, but that decree was set aside on appeal to the High Court. The learned judges (Piggott and Walsh JJ.) were of opinion that the suit was barred by Order n., r. 2, which provides that " every suit shall include the whole of the claim which the plaintiff is entitled to make in respect of the cause of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.