SIR JOHN EDGE, AMEER ALI, SIR WALTER PHILLIMORE, LORD BUCKMASTER
NAFAR CHANDRA PAL – Appellant
Versus
SHUKUR – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal by special leave from a judgment and fourteen decrees of the High Court (February 4, 1910) reversing decrees of the District Judge of Nadia.
The question for determination was whether the High Court, in allowing an appeal under s. 109A, sub-s. 3. of the Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885, had acted without jurisdiction in that it had decided the appeal upon a ground not open for it to consider.
The material facts and the terms of the relevant statutory pro visions appear from the judgment of their Lordships.
1918. April 19. Dunne K.C. for the appellant. The only ground of the decision, namely that the finding of the District Judge as to the standard of measurement applicable was wrong. was a question of fact. The right of appeal under s. 109A, sub-s. 3, of the Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885, was subject to s. 584 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882; the High Court, therefore, had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal upon a question of fact Durga Choudhrain v. Jawahir Singh (( 1890) L. R. 17 I. A. 122.); Ravi Veeraraghavulu v. Bomma Devara. (( 1914) L. R. 41 I. A. 258.)
[Lord Buckmaster. Was the present objection made to the High Court?]
The record does not show whether the poi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.