SIR GEORGE LOWNDES, SIR DINSHAH MULLA, LORD MACMILLAN
NAWAB BAHADUR OF MURSHIDABAD – Appellant
Versus
KARNANI INDUSTRIAL BANK INDUSTRIAL LIMITED – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 54 of 1930) from an order of the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction (July 15, 1929)
Law Rep. 58 Ind. App. 215 ( 1930- 1931) Nawab Bahadur of Murshidabad v. Karnani Industrial
73
reversing an order of Lort-Williams J.
The appellant as Nawab Bahadur of Murshidabad had succeeded to the benefit of a settlement of immovable properties contained in an indenture of 1891, which was confirmed by Act XV. of 1891, to which it is scheduled. The respondent bank, in execution of money decrees which it had obtained against the appellant, applied to the High Court to appoint a receiver of the rents, issues and profits of properties included in the settlement.
Lort-Williams J. dismissed the application, but upon appeal a receiver was appointed by Rankin C.J. and C. C. Ghose J.
The material terms of the indenture appear from the judgment of the Judicial Committee.
1931. Feb. 13. Dunne K.C. and Dube for the appellant. E. B. Raikes K.C, and M. R. Jardine for the respondents.
March 16. The judgment of their Lordships was delivered by
LORD MACMILLAN. By an order dated July 15, 1929, the High Court of Judicature at Fort William in Bengal, allowing an appeal from an order of Lo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.