LORD SHAW, AMEER ALI, LORD PHILLIMORE, VISCOUNT HALDANE, SIR JOHN EDGE
PALANIAPPA CHETTIAR – Appellant
Versus
ALAYAN CHETTI – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal (No. 32 of 1919) from a judgment and decree of the High Court (January 12, 1915) varying a decree of the Subordinate Judge of Madura (December 23, 1911).
The parties to the litigation were members of a Hindu joint family belonging to the caste of Athangudy Chettis, and were resident at a village called Vallalapatti in the Madura district. The suit was brought by the appellant against the respondents, his father and half-brothers by a second wife, for partition.
By paras. 6 and 13 of his plaint the appellant alleged a custom of his caste, resident at Vallalapatti and certain other villages, in the terms set out in the judgment of the Judicial Committee. By para. 7 he relied on an agreement which " following the custom " was executed by his father in 1885 before marrying his second wife, stipulating to give for the jeshtabhagam of his male children by his first wife certain [@ page LRIA 540] properties and Rs. 500, and to divide and give a moiety of the remaining family properties. He prayed to recover the properties named as jeshtabhagam, also Rs. 500 for moopu, and to have it declared that he was entitled to a moiety of the remainder of the property he also prayed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.