SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1914 Supreme(SC) 30

LORD DUNEDIN, LORD MOULTON, SIR JOHN EDGE, AMEER ALI
PAUL – Appellant
Versus
ROBSON – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellants:Westbury, Preston & Stavridi. Solicitors for respondents: Watkins & Hunter.

Judgement

Appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court; (August 1, 1911) affirming a judgment and decree of that Court in its ordinary original jurisdiction (March 29, 1911).

The suit was brought by the appellants claiming an injunction or damages for an alleged interference with their rights to access of light and air in respect of a freehold house and premises known as 7, Esplanade East, in Calcutta. The house, of which the plaintiffs were life tenants, had been used as business premises in its two lower floors, and the top floor as a residential flat. It was admitted that the appellants had acquired by pre scription rights to air and light in respect of the windows on the east side of the house, and it was alleged by them that those rights were interfered with by a new building which the respondents were erecting.

The trial took place before Stephen J. and lasted from February 9, 1911, until March 16, 1911, much evidence being adduced upon either side. On March 29, 1911, the learned judge delivered judgment dismissing the suit. He found that the light coming to the appellants premises from the east had been obstructed by the respondents new building, but that, as far as t






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top