SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(SC) 20

LORD GODDARD, SIR MADHAVAN NAIR, LORD MACMILLAN
PARASHURAM DETARAM SHAMDASANI – Appellant
Versus
KING-EMPEROR – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellant:Sanderson, Lee & Co. Solicitor for respondent: Solicitor, India Office.

Judgement

Appeal (No.23 of 1944) from a judgment and order of the High Court (Kania J.) (October 15, 1942), as modified by an order of that judge (October 16, 1942).

The question in this appeal was whether the appellant had in all the circumstances committed the offence of contempt of court in making the following two statements in open court before Kania J. on October 9, 1942, in the course of argument on a summons for a review of taxation of costs (a) "I do not "keep anything back at all. My fault is that I disclose everything, unlike members of the Bar, who are in the habit of not doing so and misleading the court.” (b) "It is "customary for the taxing masters to write what is written at the end of the paragraph, but is it considered at all?"

Kania J. found the appellant guilty of contempt of court in respect of both matters, and sentenced him to imprisonment for eight days and ordered him to pay a fine of Rs.1.000. On November 18, 1942, the High Court (Beaumont C. J. and Sen J.) granted the appellant leave to appeal to His Majesty in Council against the order of Kania J.

1945. Apr. 12. W. W. K. Page for the appellant. The appellant was not, in making either of the statements in




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top