Judgement

Appeal (No. 62 of 1920) from a judgment and decree (April 28, 1917) of the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, Central Provinces, reversing a decree (October 21, 1915) of the second Additional District Judge, Amraoti, East Berar.

The suit was brought by the first respondent against the appellant and others to recover an 8-anna share in a village, in circumstances which appear from the judgment of the Judicial Committee.

The trial judge dismissed the suit, but on appeal to the Court of the Judicial Commissioner a decree was made for partition and possession.

1921. Oct. 27, 28. Dube for the appellant. The letter of April 11, 1910, was not inadmissible under s. 49 of the Registration Act. It did not affect title; the appellants title was established by the registered document with proof that the terms had been accepted by his uncles and that the event referred to in the document had occurred. The letter was admissible as evidence upon those points, and as showing the circumstances in which the appellant was in possession Baid Rain v. Tika Ram. (( 1917)1. L. R. 39 A. 300.) Further, the appellant and his uncles having acted for many years on the compromise contained in the reg