LORD PHILLIMORE, LORD SINHA, AMEER ALI, LORD SALVESEN
PANAGANTI RAMARAYANIMGAR (DEFENDANT NO. 1) – Appellant
Versus
MAHARAJA OF VENKATAGIRI – Respondent
Judgement
82 Law. Rep. 54 Ind. App. 68 ( 1926- 1927) Panaganti Ramarayanimgar V. Maharaja of Venkatagiri
183
Appeal (No. 154 of 1924) from a decree of the High Court (April 19, 1920) varying a decree of the Subordinate Judge of North Arcot (March 21, 1917).
The suit was brought by the late Maharaja of Venkatagiri, now represented by the first respondent, for redemption of a mortgage with possession dated March 13, 1909; the mortgagors interest had been purchased by the plaintiff on October 22, 1915, and the mortgage had been assigned to the defendant-appellant on September 9, 1913.
The plaintiff by his plaint prayed (a) that an account might be taken of the amount due to the defendants on the securities; (b) on payment delivery of the documents and of possession of the properties free from any encumbrances.
The Subordinate Judge made a decree for redemption on payment of Rs. 2,47,884 with interest. On appeal to the High Court (Wallis C.J. and Seshagiri Ayyar J.) the decree was modified by adding a further Rs.29,711. The question in the present appeal was whether certain other sums should not be brought into the mortgage account, and whether sufficient interest had been allowed. Amo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.