Back
1947 Supreme(SC) 9
PRIVY COUNCIL [ON APPEAL FROM THEEAST INDIES]
LORD WRIGHT, LORD PORTER, LORD UTHWATT, SIR MADHAVAN NAIR AND SIR JOHN BEAUMONT.
PRAFULLA KUMAR MUKHERJEE - Appellant
Versus
BANK OF COMMERCE, LIMITED, KHULNA - Respondents
On Appeal from the Federal Court of India.
Decided On : Feb. 11, 1947
Solicitor for the appellants and the intervener:The Solicitor, India Office. Solicitors for the respondent: T. L. Wilson & Co.
The court established that the 'pith and substance' doctrine determines legislative validity. A provincial law is valid if its true nature falls within the provincial list, even if it incidentally encroaches upon subjects reserved for the federal legislature.
Headnote:(A) Constitution Act - Section 100 and Section 107 - Seventh Schedule, List I (Items 28, 33, 38), List II (Item 27), and List III - Distribution of legislative powers between Federal and Provincial legislatures - Validity of a provincial law limiting the recovery of principal and interest on loans - Conflict between provincial power over money lending and federal power over promissory notes and banking - The validity of a statute is determined by its "pith and substance" or its "true nature and character." If an Act is in pith and substance within the provincial jurisdiction, it remains valid even if it incidentally trenches on matters reserved for the federal legislature. (Paras 24-25)
(B) Legislative Jurisdiction - Overlapping of powers - It is not possible to make a clean cut between the powers of various legislatures; they are bound to overlap. A strict verbal interpretation of legislative lists would result in many beneficial statutes being declared invalid. The priority of the Federal List does not prevent the provincial legislature from dealing with any matter which may incidentally affect an item in that list, provided the substance of the Act is within provincial competence. (Paras 24-25)
(C) Pith and Substance - Extent of invasion - The degree of invasion into the federal field is not a material factor for determining validity per se, but is relevant for determining the pith and substance of the Act. The question is not whether the trespass is more or less, but whether the trespass shows that the true nature of the Act is not provincial but federal. (Para 25)
Facts of the case:
A provincial legislature enacted a law limiting the amount recoverable by moneylenders on loans, including principal and interest, and prohibited payments exceeding these limits. The law was retrospective and applied to loans secured by promissory notes. A financial institution challenged the validity of the law, contending that the provincial legislature had no power to affect promissory notes or banking business, as these were exclusively reserved for the federal legislature under the Constitution Act.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the impugned Act dealt in pith and substance with money lending and moneylenders. Since taking a promissory note as security is a common practice of moneylenders, a legislature cannot effectively deal with money lending if it cannot limit the liability of a borrower in respect of such notes. The promissory note is merely the instrument for securing the loan, not the substance of the transaction.
Issues: Whether a provincial law regulating money lending is ultra vires to the extent that it incidentally affects promissory notes and banking, which are subjects exclusively reserved for the federal legislature.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the "pith and substance" doctrine applies to the distribution of legislative powers. Where the true nature and character of a law fall within the provincial list, the law is valid even if it incidentally encroaches upon federal subjects. The priority of the Federal List does not preclude provincial legislation that incidentally touches upon federal matters, as long as the substance of the law remains within provincial competence.
Result: Appeal allowed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
-
constitutional law
-
legislative jurisdiction
- distribution of powers
- pith and substance doctrine
-
legislative jurisdiction
-
banking and finance law
- money lending
-
negotiable instruments
- promissory notes
Judgement
Consolidated Appeals (No. 19 of 1946) from a judgment and three orders of the Federal Court of India (December 12, 1944) which reversed a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta in its revisional jurisdiction (February 24, 1944), which had affirmed judgments and decrees of the Subordinate Judge of Khulna (November 8, 1941) and of the Munsif of Khulna (January 31 and June 12, 1942).
[Two appeals. No. 19 of 1946, and No. 9 of 1946 (post p. 45), were heard together by the Board.]
The following facts and citation of the statutory provisions are taken from the judgment of the Judicial Committee. The question in dispute in this appeal was as to the validity of the Bengal Money Lenders Act, 1940. That Act limited the amount recoverable by a moneylender on his loans for principal and interest and prohibited the payment of sums larger than those permitted by the Act.
The respondent was an incorporated body to which, by an order of May 12, 1941, passed by the High Court of Calcutta under s. 153A of the Indian Companies Act, the assets of the Khulna Loan Bank, Ld. (earlier known as the Khulna Loan Co., Ld.) were transferred. Some of the cases now under appeal to their Lordships Board were brought by the respondent who claimed to recover loans and interest alleged to be due on promissory notes executed by appellant borrowers, and in other instances by appellant debtors claiming a declaration that their indebtedness was at least diminished by the provisions of the Act, and even in some instances that they were entitled to repayment of sums overpaid. The proceedings began in 1941, 1942 and 1943, but were concerned with loans made at a much earlier date not by the respondent, but by the Khulna Loan Co. or the Khulna Loan Bank. In every case the loans were secured by promissory notes executed contemporaneously with the transaction.
The Act, the validity of which their Lordships had to determine, by s. 30 provided that "Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, or in any agreement (1.) No borrower shall be liable to pay after the " commencement of this Act— " more than a limited sum in respect of principal and interest, or more than a certain percentage of the sum advanced by way of interest. Moreover, it was retrospective in its effect, and its limitations could be relied on by a borrower by way of defence to an action by the moneylender, or the borrower could himself institute a suit in respect of a loan to which the provisions of the Act applied. Section 100 of the Government of India Act, 1935, was in the following terms—
"100. (1) Notwithstanding anything in the two next succeeding sub-sections, the Federal Legislature has, and a Provincial Legislature has not, power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule to this Act (hereinafter called the Federal Legislative List).
"(2.) Notwithstanding anything in the next succeeding sub-section, the Federal Legislature, and, subject to the preceding sub-section, a Provincial Legislature also, have power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List III in the said schedule (hereinafter called the Concurrent Legislative List).
2 Law Rep. 74 Ind. App. 23 ( 1946- 1947) Prafulla Kumar Mukherjee v. Bank of C ommerce
14
"(3.) Subject to the two preceding sub-sections, the Provincial Legislature has, and the Federal Legislature has not, power to make laws for a Province or any part thereof with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List II in the said schedule (hereinafter called the Provincial Legislative List).
"(4.) The Federal Legislature has power to make laws with respect to matters enumerated in the Provincial Legislative List except for a Province or any part thereof.” The Federal Legislative List referred to in that section assigned to the Federal legislature jurisdiction to make laws with respect to
"(28.) Cheques, bills of exchange, promissory notes and other like instruments.
