LORD BUCKMASTER, LORD DUNEDIN, VISCOUNT HALDANE
RANI HEMANTA KUMARI DEBI – Appellant
Versus
MIDNAPUR ZAMINDARI COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal by special leave from a judgment and decree of the High Court (July 6, 1914) affirming a decree of the Subordinate Judge of Zilla Nadia (March 29, 1910).
Law Rep. 46 Ind. App. 240 ( 1918- 1919) Rani Hemanta Kumari Debi v. Midnapur Zamindari Co. Ltd
82
The suit was brought by the respondents in February, 1909, as successors in interest to Robert Watson & Co., Ld., claiming specific performance of an agreement to lease to that company certain lands if the appellant recovered them in a suit which she had instituted against the Government for that purpose. The agreement was contained in a compromise petition dated September 20, 1897, in a suit (No. 73 of 1895) brought by the appellant against the said company for the recovery of certain other lands. The compromise petition was embodied in a decree of the Court made on the same date under s, 375 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882.
The facts more fully appear from the judgment of their Lordships.
Numerous issues were framed, two only of which were material to the present appeal, namely, (4.) Whether the Court had jurisdiction to pass any decree or order in regard to lands outside the scope of suit No. 73 of 1895, and w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.