AMEER ALI, SIR JOHN EDGE, LORD SHAW OF DUNFERMLINE, VISCOUNT HALDANE
SAHU RAM CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
BHUP SINGH – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court (May 26, 1913) affirming the decree of the Subordinate Judge of Mainpuri.
The first six respondents were members of a joint Hindu family, governed by the Mitakshara, Bhup Singh being the father and the other five his sons and grandsons.
On January 6, 1883, Bhup Singh borrowed Rs.200 from one Bhagirath under a hypothecation bond which stated that the money was borrowed to meet the necessity of Bhup Singh. The bond provided for interest at Rs.18 per month, subject to half-yearly rests, and hypothecated a one-biswa share in a zamindari, the property of the joint family, but described as belonging to the borrower.
In 1884 Bhup Singh mortgaged the same property together with other joint family property to the father of the appellants. In 1893 the appellants, their father being dead, sued to enforce the mortgage of 1884, and a decree was made in their favour conditional upon their discharging the prior mortgage in favour of Bhagirath. They accordingly paid the amount due upon the bond into Court under 8. 83 of Act IV. of 1882 ; the Court paid the money over to Bhagirath, and the bond was made over to the appellants. The appell
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.