SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(SC) 40

LORD BLANESBURGH, SIR JOHN WALLIS, LORD SINHA, VISCOUNT SUMNER
SALEH MAHOMED UMER DOSSAL (A FIRM) – Appellant
Versus
NATHOOMAL KESSAMAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellants: Watkins & Hunter.

Judgement

Appeal (No. 7 of 1926) from an order of the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Sind in its revisional jurisdiction (April 6, 1925) reversing an order of that Court in its District Court jurisdiction.

By a contract in writing dated December 1, 1919, the respondent agreed to purchase from the appellants "600 bales only American old newspapers, each bale of 5 cwts.," at a named price. The contract contained a clause referring all disputes to the arbitration of two arbitrators in Karachi with power to them to nominate an umpire in the event of disagreement.

Differences, which arose owing to the respondent refusing to take delivery of 400 out of the 600 bales contracted for, were referred under the contract to two arbitrators; upon their disagreeing they nominated an umpire.

On November 8, 1920, the umpire issued his award, which recited that the reference was as to certain

4 Law. Rep. 54 Ind. App. 427 ( 1926- 1927) Saleh Mahomed Umer Dossal V. Nathoomal Kessamal

205

disputes arising between the present parties " under a contract made between them, No. 8/06, dated December 1, 1919." The award contained no further reference to the contract or its terms. It provided that the






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top