SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1929 Supreme(SC) 31

LORD CARSON, LORD ATKIN, LORD SALVESEN
SKINNER – Appellant
Versus
NAUNIHAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors for appellant:Chapman-Walker & Shephard. Solicitors for respondent: Douglas Grant & Dold.

Judgement

Appeal (No. 86 of 1927) from a decree of the High Court (March 27, 1925) reversing a decree of the Subordinate Judge of Mozaffarnagar (January 20, 1923).

The suit was brought by Alice Georgina Skinner to recover possession of five villages by redemption of a mortgage executed in 1863 by her father. The plaintiff had become entitled to the villages in 1919 under her fathers will upon the successive deaths without issue of her three brothers. The defendant purchased the villages in 1904 from the Nawab of Rampur, to whom the mortgagees, acting as absolute owners, had mortgaged, and had subsequently sold them, in 1898 and 1903 respectively. The plaintiff died before the appeal to the High Court; the present appellant was her executor.

The facts appear fully from the judgment of the Judicial Committee.

The effect of the will of the plaintiffs father and the position as to mortgages created by him were dealt with by the Board in 1913 in Skinner v. Naunihal Singh. (( 1913) L. R. 40 I. A. 105.)

The Subordinate Judge made a decree in favour of the plaintiff ; he held that art. 140 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, Sch. I., applied, and that consequently the suit was not barred b























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top