SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1921 Supreme(SC) 41

VISCOUNT HALDANE, LORD ATKINSON, SIR JOHN EDGE
SITARAM BHAURAO DESHMUKH – Appellant
Versus
JIAUL HASAN SIRAJUL KHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitor for appellants :Edward Dalgado. Solicitors for respondent: T. L. Wilson & Co.

Judgement

Appeal (No. 149 of 1919) from a judgment of the High Court (February 5, 1917) affirming a judgment of the Additional First Class Subordinate Judge of Thana.

The suit was brought by the original plaintiff in 1909 claiming a declaration that he was entitled under Mahomedan law to a right of pre-emption of a one-fourth share in two villages in the Kolaba District in the Bombay Presidency. The plaintiff died before the Subordinate Judge settled the issues in the suit, and the present respondent, the administrator of his estate, was permitted by the High Court to continue the litigation.

The facts, which were not in dispute upon the appeal, are stated in the judgment of the Judicial Committee, and more fully in a report of the proceedings in the High Court at I. L. R. 41 B. 636.

Law. Rep. 48 Ind. App. 475 ( 1920- 1921) Sitaram Bhaurao Deshmukh V. Jiaul Hasan Sirajul Khan

235

The High Court, affirming the decree of the Subordinate Judge, held that the plaintiff had a right of pre-emption.

The reasons of the learned judges (Sir Basil Scott C.J. and Beaman J.) appear from the report above mentioned.

1921. May 6, 9. Sir George Lowndes K.C. and Parikh for the appellant. Both Courts



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top