VISCOUNT HALDANE, LORD DUNEDIN, LORD DARLING
UDOYCHAND PANNALAL – Appellant
Versus
P. E. GUZDAR AND COMPANY – Respondent
Judgement
Petition for special leave to appeal from a decree (January 30, 1924) of the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction reversing a decree of Greaves J. whereby in a suit brought by the petitioner an award dated December 6, 1922, was set aside; and from an order (July 28, 1922) of the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction affirming an order of Ghose J. whereby a suit for damages brought by the petitioner was stayed.
The facts appear from the judgment of the Judicial Committee.
On May 5, 1924, an application by the petitioner to the High Court for a certificate that the case in
Law. Rep. 52 Ind. App. 207 ( 1924- 1925)
Udoychand Pannalal V. P. E. Guzdar 23
which the decree of 1924 had been made was a fit one for appeal to His Majesty in Council was dismissed.
The learned judges (Sanderson C.J. and Walmsley J.) said that the application could succeed only if the case came within the second paragraph of s. 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; but, in their opinion, the petitioners claim in the suit of the contract was not " property " within the meaning of that section, and consequently the decree did not " involve, directly or indirectly, some claim or question to or res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.