SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1940 Supreme(SC) 8

VISCOUNT MAUGHAM, LORD PORTER, SIR GEORGE RANKIN
THOMAS BEAR AND SONS (INDIA) LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PRAYAG NARAIN – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitor for appellants: D. M. Oppenheim.

Judgement

Appeal (No. 18 of 1939) from a decree of a Division Bench of the High Court (March 13, 1935), affirming a decree of the Additional District Judge of Cawnpore (April 11, 1930).

The action out of which this appeal arose was brought on May 27, 1929, by the appellants, Thomas Bear & Sons (India) Ld., to restrain infringement of trade mark rights and passing-off by the respondent, Prayag Narain. The appellants were manufacturers and sellers of cigarettes and of

Law. Rep. 67 Ind. App. 212 ( 1939- 1940) Thomas Bear and Sons (India) Limited V. Prayag Narain

54

"Virginia "Birds Eye" tobacco for smoking in pipes. The tobacco was sold in packets and tins bearing a mark the distinguishing feature of which was the representation of an elephant. The goods were well known and asked for throughout India as "Elephant Mark.” The respondent manufactured chewing tobacco, and sold it in packets and tins, on which was the picture of an elephant not unlike that used by the appellants, though there were differences, particularly in colour. In other respects the packets and tins were unlike the containers in which the appellants goods were put upon the market, and the respondents labels bore the






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top