LORD PARMOOR, AMEER ALI, LORD WRENBURY, VISCOUNT HALDANE, SIR JOHN EDGE
V. VENKATANARAYANA PILLAI (SINCE DECEASED), REPRESENTED BY V. KUPPUSAMI – Appellant
Versus
V. SUBBAMMAL – Respondent
Judgement
Appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court (March 12, 1912) affirming a judgment and decree of Wallis J. (March 26, 1909).
By a will made in 1889 V. Venkatarama Pillai (hereinafter called the testator) referred to his intention to adopt Venkatakrishna Pillai, and, in the event of his death before the said adoption was completed, authorized his widow Subbammal to complete the adoption, and further provided that if the son to be adopted should die during his widows lifetime she might take in adoption one of the sons of the testators daughter Rajammal. At the time this will was made the testator was the sole surviving coparcener of the property to which it related, but upon the adoption taking place he ceased to be so.
17 Law. Rep. 43 Ind. App. 20 ( 1915- 1916)
V. Venkatanarayana Pillai V. V. Subbammal 118
In February, 1890, the testator duly completed the adoption of Venkatakrishna Pillai, and in March, 1890, he executed a second will. By that will he disposed of his property in favour of his said adopted son, and provided (by clause 5) that in the event of the death of the adopted son the property should be enjoyed by his issue, with further dispositions in the ev
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.