SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 238

DALVEER BHANDARI, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
Vinodan – Appellant
Versus
Vishwanathan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Subramonium Prasad, Advocate.
For the Respondent:A. Raghunath, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Dalveer Bhandari, J. —

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21st May, 1998 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in A.S. No.254 of 1990.

2. This is an unfortunate litigation regarding partition of a building constructed on a small piece of land between the brothers. It is not disputed that the land is jointly owned by both the brothers. The dispute is restricted over the building which has been constructed on the part of the land. The matter has travelled from the Subordinate Court, Trichur to this Court.

3. A serious endeavour has been made by this Court to amicably settle the matter. On 6.8.2008, the following order was passed by this Court:

“In the present case, the dispute is between two brothers. The ownership of the land is admittedly joint. The short controversy is regarding the cost of construction over that plot. The case of the respondent is that he has spent the entire cost of construction whereas the case of the appellant is that he has also contributed equally to the cost of construction.

In our considered view, this controversy can be easily sorted out by the parties. We have requested the learned counsel for the parties to ensure t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top